Skip to main content

Tampa Can Ban Cars (Like Utrecht Did)

My favorite Mark Wagenburr video on his channel Markenlei is the video titled Potterstraat, Utrecht (Netherlands).



In it, he describes how the historic city of Utrecht, Netherlands actually went down a similar path that the United States went down in the 40s and 50s. They, too, demolished their historic buildings to make way for a new transportation era dominated by cars. They, too, created grand city plans to endlessly widen streets to make way for the automobile. In fact, the buildings they so carelessly flattened were centuries old rather than decades old like the ones in America. This fact makes me feel a little less embarrassed about our country's car-centric development path.

However, the 1960s and '70s generation of Hollanders chose a drastically different path than ours did. In Utrecht, traffic continued to grow no matter how much they widened their streets. Life in the city center was simply awful, and this created a widespread a change of mind. So in 1965, they decided to ban cars on Saturday afternoons in the city center. It was so successful that in the early 1970s, they banned cars permanently from the city center.

Image result for when was cars banned from utrecht city center
A little "before" and "after" action for ya. Top pic is from 1965, bottom pic is from 2011.

That's right. They did it. They effectively banned cars. And they implemented several other magnificent, yet simple development policies as well. They reconstructed buildings in the right-of-way of roads they had previously widened, narrowing them back to their original width. They created bicycle paths separated from vehicular traffic by large medians with beautiful trees and landscaping in them to narrow streets and prioritize bicycle infrastructure. They lowered speed limits, blocked neighborhood streets to through-traffic, and poured raised pedestrian crosswalks all throughout the city.

They concentrated motor traffic where they wanted it to go, and they took back the streets for the people. We can do that too. We just have to demand it like they did in Utrecht. Perhaps we could start with a pilot project or "experiment" on a busy downtown street like Kennedy Blvd.


Popular posts from this blog

Designing for Disabilities: Necessary for Some, Good for All

Within minutes of arriving in Delft and stepping foot into the sunlight, I was passed by a person in a motorchair zooming along cheerfully smack-dab in the middle of the bike lane to my left. It reminded me of how back home, people in wheelchairs often have no choice but to roll cautiously alongside speeding vehicular traffic in dangerous 3-foot bike lanes that are separated from cars by nothing more than a thin white line. I regularly see people in wheelchairs in the bike lane along 56th Street between Fletcher and Fowler in Tampa, for example, where traffic often goes over 50mph. But this was very different. These wheelchairs had motors and they went fast - nearly as fast as bicyclists. And they were on separated bike lanes and bicycle tracks that were far from car lanes. I found that I didn't fear for the lives of these people. The man seen here cruises down the center of the bike lane in his motorchair. The more I observed and thought about it, the more it began to mak...

Stressed While Biking? Stress Maps Help Identify Infrastructure Priorities

I really enjoyed our second experiment with the TU Delft PhD students because I think it could be extremely useful to how we prioritize the development of bicycle infrastructure in my hometown. We created a rubric for grading the “stress level” of bicycle infrastructure, then we rode our bikes around town and "graded" different routes based on that rubric. This data can be used to create a bicycle stress map like the one pictured below. Some places, like Madison, Wisconsin, have created phone apps similar to Waze and Google Maps that allow people to choose a bike route based on the stress level of that route. Pictured is a stress map of Madison, Wisconsin.  We first split into groups. Each group generated a list of physical attributes of a street or route that might make a bike ride comfortable or stressful. For example, the type of bike lanes (if any) available, the width of the facility, the smoothness or bumpiness of the road, nearby greenery, traffic volume...